
Errors in Early Calatagan Pot Materialby Hector Santos© 1996 by Hector Santos All rights reserved.
This error was incorporated in Jean-Paul Potet's "Morphologie du Philippin.". A wrong illustration was also used in "The Butuan paleograph: ethnographic implications of an ancient script" by Jesus T. Peralta in the March 1979 issue of Archipelago. Both illustrations in the above articles drop symbol 3-6. The Archipelago illustration, which incidentally had nothing to do with the article, additionally left out symbol 6-4. (See "Calatagan Pot Translations" to see what these symbols are.)
Where and how did these errors originate? Although I have not reviewed all previously written articles with sketches of the Calatagan pot, the most widely circulated and quoted source was Juan Francisco's Philippine Palaeography (Quezon City, 1973). On page 101 of the book, Fig. 11, Plano-view of the Calatagan Pot Scripts, shows an artist's rendition with only 6 symbols in Group 3.
Francisco says on page 36,
4. The next problem concerns the identity of the letters. There are thirty-nine symbols in the inscription...There are actually 40 symbols written on the Calatagan pot, not counting the vertical separators. Undoubtedly, there are many more articles in circulation with wrong illustrations. I believe most errors came from use of the widely-cited Francisco book, one of the earliest ones that came out.
Additional Reading
Other Mysterious Philippine Scripts
Santos, Hector. "Errors in Early Calatagan Pot Material" in A Philippine Leaf at http://www.bibingka.com/dahon/mystery/pot2.htm. US, October 28, 1996. | |
Please send me your comments. I would love to hear from you. Hector Santos <hectorsan@bibingka.com> Los Angeles |